Is search dying? Your manual within 140 characters?

Internet Psychologist Graham Jones wrote an article last week, in which he stated, search is dying, and is being replaced by sharing information socially.

“So worried is Microsoft about Google that they haven’t realised that Google is not their real competition any more. It is the likes of Twitter and Ecademy…Google already knows this. Much of their labs work and their adaptations of what they already offer are geared to sharing information socially. They realise that search as we know it is dying. Microsoft is so focused on fighting Google, they haven’t realised they are on the wrong battlefield.”

Let’s assume Graham is correct. Where does this leave online user assistance?

Since Online Help was introduced, technical communicators have provided hypertext links, key word search and an index to help users find information.

Today, there is greater emphasis on key word search (finding stuff via Google), and we’ve seen a few authors add tag clouds too.

So how could online user assistance (“Help”) be shared socially? Is it likely that someone will respond to each question by tweeting a link to a particular page in a Help file?

That’s incredibly labour-intensive. For Support teams to answer queries via Twitter might be less time-intensive than responding to emails, but it may be difficult to provide an answer within 140 characters. Most likely, they could provide to links to places where the question is answered.

We’ve talked about the emergence of “landing pages” in Web based Help (so have Michael Hughes and Matthew Ellison),  and that may be a less intensive way to guide people to the information they need. By this I mean, point people towards say 6 landing pages, from which they can be guided quickly to the information they need.

It may also be difficult for users to pose their questions within the limitations of Twitter.

A more likely scenario, I believe, would be to create Twitter avatars. The fictional characters from “Mad Men” post regular tweets about their imaginary lives. If Don Draper and Peggy Olsen can tweet, then why not create a personas for your customers and let them do the same? Billy the Beginner and Patty the Power user, for example? Their posts could guide customers through the key tasks via a series of daily Twitter posts. 

Of course, this is more than about how to best use Twitter. It’s about social networks, the ideas from the Cluetrain Manifesto and Web 2.0 ideas of syndicating content, collaborating with your user base and aggregating content.

Graham Jones concluded by saying ”just concentrate on providing and sharing good material”.  Technical Authors can help the organisation provide good material. What we may all have to work out is how we can share this material in more effective ways.

August times

The summer months have often been a busy period for us, and this year is no exception. In addition to arranging countless interviews for candidates and starting off a number of XML-related projects, we’ve also been working on improving our training services.

We’re working on some new online courses, which has lead to some major changes behind the scenes. It involves boring stuff around how orders are taken (and paid for),  and exciting ideas around how we can deliver training.

We still welcome feedback on what training topics you’d like to see  – simply send us an email with your thoughts.

What’s the point of user documentation, from a marketing perspective?

I was talking to a Documentation Manager earlier in the week, who was telling me she had a new boss – a VP of Marketing. She was having to work for someone who didn’t see the value in user documentation, and she was finding it difficult fighting her corner.

The challenge she faces is understanding the way marketing people see the world, and then explaining the role of documentation within this world view.

So does this organisation actually need to spend so much on documentation? Maybe this Marketing VP could be right. If the bulk of its users “muddle through”, then maybe they never look at the documentation?

Muddling through means users work out the main things they want to do, but never discover the extra features and capabilities of a product. It’s the path to millions of video recorders in homes flashing 00:00 on the front, because few people knew how to set the timer.  They could still play video tapes, they just couldn’t record programmes whilst they were away from the machine.

The downside of this, is that users then place little value on these extra features – they never use them - and the product becomes seen as a commodity. If they all do the same thing, then why not buy the cheapest?

Marketing people describe this as market differentiation and market positioning. If you are positioning your product away from the cheapest end of the market, then you need users to value the capabilities that make your product different. You need users to use them. So perhaps you should explain how documentation can help the organisation achieve this goal.

Marketing people often talk about market segmentation and target markets. They use different messages for different groups. So it’s worth talking about the different types of users – different key markets – and they ways they prefer to receive information.

Marketing people also talk about the average Customer Lifetime Value. Wikipedia describes this as:

“Use of customer lifetime value as a marketing metric tends to place greater emphasis on customer service and long-term customer satisfaction, rather than on maximizing short-term sales.”

This value should extend to not only the revenues generated by a customer, but also the costs incurred in supporting a customer. So it’s worth talking about how user documentation helps retain customers and reduce the cost of supporting them over time.

However, the Marketing department might be only looking at new ways to promote the business - using Twitter, user forums, wikis and suchlike. These types of Marketing people are usually focused on Relationship Marketing – building trusted relationships between the customer (or prospect) and the organisation. They may also be focused on Search Engine Optimisation – appearing high up the list in Google. So it’s worth looking back at some of the posts we’ve written in this blog on how user documentation helps builds trust with clients or prospects and can provide information rich content that Google loves.

They may also be thinking about brand image and the perceived quality of the product. These are reasons often cited by customers when we ask them why they’ve engaged us to write their user documentation.

In order to understand the way marketing people see the world, it’s worth reading Blogs on marketing (by people such as Seth Godin), the Cluetrain Manifesto, and reading a few books on marketing.

“It’s so intuitive, it doesn’t need an instruction manual.”

I told someone yesterday that there was one piece of technology that was so intuitive it didn’t need an instruction manual. I was talking about the traditional fixed wire telephone.

It turns out I was wrong.  A quick search on YouTube revealed there was a major education campaign in the 1920s and 30s, instructing the public how to use a rotary dial telephone.

See also I have to dial my own phone? part one and part two

It’s easy to forget how often people struggle with new technology, and how quickly we learn to use it.

What can Technical Authors learn from celebrity chefs and musicians?

We wrote recently about the Attention Economy and the challenges faced by technical publications departments. So what about other business sectors that are facing similar problems – can we learn from them?

Andrew Savikas has been looking at some of the ways in which the Publishing industry, aspiring young musicians and celebrity chefs have been tackling the problem of getting value from content.

He said:

“The thing that most publishers (and authors) spend most of their time fretting about (making it, selling it, distributing it, “protecting” it) isn’t the thing that their customers are actually buying….Whether they realize it or not, media companies are in the service business, not the content business.”

From the music industry, he highlighted advice from Trent Reznor:

“[W]hat you NEED to do is this – give your music away as high-quality DRM-free MP3s. Collect people’s email info in exchange (which means having the infrastructure to do so) and start building your database of potential customers. Then, offer a variety of premium packages for sale and make them limited editions / scarce goods.”

Emerging musicians such as Emily Barker have used MySpace to do this sort of thing. Emily has nearly 5,000 followers – not bad for a folk singer from Bridgetown, Western Australia (pop. 2000). Notice also, her last album recording was funded by her fans.

From celebrity chefs, Savikas observed:

“Celebrity chefs aren’t particularly worried that doing TV shows and selling cookbooks describing exactly how to make the food they serve in their restaurants will harm business.”

So what could technical authors do that’s similar? Perhaps:

  •  Publish some free content on the Web, with further information available in exchange for an email address. You could then mail this database of users with news and updates, to increase customer loyalty and engagement with your products. These email addresses could then be passed to your Marketing department – some people may actually be prospects rather than customers. 
  • Offer premium “products” in addition to the standard downloadable manual or online Help. This could be personalised training over the Web, or a series of animated movies. The Technical Publications content could as a feeder for these additional services.

Why you should write Help for your competitors’ products

At our “Developing your career as a technical author”  course yesterday there was a great discussion about meeting the needs of “Generation Y” – the part of the working population under 27 who have grown up with the Internet. It’s a group that makes up about 13% of the working population.

We talked about the fact that they acquire so much of  their information from the Web. From many of them, if Google can’t find your content, it doesn’t exist.

This led me to think, if your competitors’  Help is not available on the Web, then why not write it for them?  With the majority of Generation Y using Google to find Help, there’s a good chance they would end up reading your version of Help.

This gives you the opportunity to explain the complexities of a particular competitor’s product and contrast it with your company’s offering. You could end up persuading prospects to buy your product instead of those of your competitors. You might even win some of your competitors’ customers.

Attention Economics

The various discussions concerning the future of the Society of Technical Communication reminded me of the concept of Attention Economics and Attention as a product.

Herbert Simon wrote in the 1970s:

“In an information-rich world, the wealth of information means a dearth of something else: a scarcity of whatever it is that information consumes. What information consumes is rather obvious: it consumes the attention of its recipients.

Hence a wealth of information creates a poverty of attention and a need to allocate that attention efficiently among the overabundance of information sources that might consume it”

Technical Communication – user manuals and online Help – fits well with this idea of Attention Economics. If you’d like to know more, then do read the Wikipedia entry on this topic: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attention_economy