--- title: "How much content can you actually re-use when you move to single sourcing?" id: "4896" type: "post" slug: "how-much-content-can-you-actually-re-use-when-you-move-to-single-sourcing" published_at: "2012-12-03T17:48:32+00:00" modified_at: "2012-12-03T17:48:32+00:00" url: "https://www.cherryleaf.com/2012/12/how-much-content-can-you-actually-re-use-when-you-move-to-single-sourcing/" markdown_url: "https://www.cherryleaf.com/2012/12/how-much-content-can-you-actually-re-use-when-you-move-to-single-sourcing.md" excerpt: "One of the challenges when considering moving to a single sourcing authoring environment, such as DITA, is determining the Return on Investment. This often boils down to a key question: how much content can you actually re-use? Organisations typically attempt..." taxonomy_category: - "CMS" - "content management" - "DITA" - "single sourcing" - "Technical Author" - "Technical Documentation" - "trends" taxonomy_post_tag: - "cms" - "consultancy" - "content management" - "content strategy" - "DITA" - "single sourcing" - "trends" --- One of the challenges when considering moving to a single sourcing authoring environment, such as DITA, is determining the Return on Investment. This often boils down to a key question: how much content can you actually re-use? Organisations typically attempt to answer this question in a number of ways: - Conducting a semi-manual information audit of the existing content to identify the number of times the same chunks of information is repeated. Unfortunately, this can be a large and lengthly exercise. - If the content is translated, getting reports from Translation Memory tools indicating where content might be repeated. Unfortunately, if you’re not translating your content, you won’t have this information. - Using benchmark industry measures. Unfortunately, these can vary enormously (from 25% to 75% content re-use), and your situation may be totally different. In an ideal world, you’d be able use an application that could look at all your content and give you a report telling you the where content is repeated. It could do the “heavy lifting” in the information audit automatically for you. This programmatic analysis of reuse within existing content, at an affordable cost, is now starting to become possible. A great deal of research has been carried out, in the fields of computational linguistics and probability, into using [n-grams](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/N-gram) to find common content. An n-gram is a contiguous sequence of letters or words in a piece of text. Unfortunately, this approach has been impracticable for real-world, large amounts of content: it’s required too much computing in-memory. It’s also been complicated by other factors; according to [Paul D. Clough](http://ir.shef.ac.uk/cloughie/papers/transfer.pdf) : > In most cases, text is reused under certain constraints that cause the text to be rewritten (e.g. time, space, change of tense etc.). Accurately measuring text reuse therefore involves identifying not only verbatim text, but also text that has undergone a number of, potentially complex, rewriting transformations. The good news is, with recent developments in the field of [big data](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_data) , it’s becoming easier to tackle large, unstructured data analysis such as we require. For example: - [Richard Marsden](http://www.monlp.com/2012/05/17/using-berkeleydb-to-create-a-large-n-gram-table/) has developed an approach for analysing n-grams that offloads much of the in-memory requirements. - [Researchers at the University of Sheffield](http://www.aclweb.org/anthology-new/S/S12/S12-1008.pdf) have reported a new approach that identifies both verbatim and reused-but-rewritten common texts. Proprietary solution providers are also responding. For example, DCL has announced Harmonizer On Demand, an online portal to its Harmonizer proprietary “content redundancy solution”. Although it’s hard to determine how quickly they will appear, it seems likely we will see considerable developments in the technology we can use for identifying and quantifying common re-usable content. As a result, it will be a lot easier for organisations to measure the benefits they will get by moving to a single sourcing authoring environment. See also: - [Reduce your documentation costs and improve your responsiveness with a Content Management System (CMS)](https://www.cherryleaf.com/consultancy-services-in-user-assistance-and-documentation/documentation_services_cms/) - Google I/O 2011: App Engine MapReduce presentation: ### Share this: - [Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook](https://www.cherryleaf.com/2012/12/how-much-content-can-you-actually-re-use-when-you-move-to-single-sourcing/?share=facebook) - [Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn](https://www.cherryleaf.com/2012/12/how-much-content-can-you-actually-re-use-when-you-move-to-single-sourcing/?share=linkedin) - [Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp](https://www.cherryleaf.com/2012/12/how-much-content-can-you-actually-re-use-when-you-move-to-single-sourcing/?share=jetpack-whatsapp) - [Share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky](https://www.cherryleaf.com/2012/12/how-much-content-can-you-actually-re-use-when-you-move-to-single-sourcing/?share=bluesky) - ### *Related* ### 4 Comments Regarding content reuse metrics when talking about technical documentation (and XML DITA), you might want to have a look at: What is the best metric to measure the success of your content reuse? by Bill Hackos [http://www.infomanagementcenter.com/enewsletter/200806/third.htm](http://www.infomanagementcenter.com/enewsletter/200806/third.htm) Thank you Mari-Louise. The problem with those metrics is they rely on the content being in a repository. You have to have committed to a pilot. Fortuitously, the percentage of reused content will go up as it becomes easier to find and identify reusable content. In other words, the effort taken to measure the benefit of reuse will itself increase the benefit. Nice. OXygen has a wonderful DITA Map Matric Report transformation, which reports like this: ————————————— Content reuse Total reused words (words in conref content) nnn. Content reuse percentage (words) is nn.nn%. Total reused elements (elements in conref content) nn. Elements reuse percentage is nn.nn%. Total content reference elements nn. Reused elements: [list of elelments and count] ————————————— You can also select “Search references” on an element that’s been refered to by a conref, to see all the places where it has been used. (I’ve managed to crash Oxygen a couple of time with it though.) You _don’t_ need a repository at all. DITA is pretty much a plain text database and CMS _all by itself_. Content reuse isn’t necessarily good if all you have is a big tangle. It does offer a well-needed way out of the commonly used cut-and-paste approach. ### Leave a Reply[Cancel reply](/2012/12/how-much-content-can-you-actually-re-use-when-you-move-to-single-sourcing/#respond) This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. [Learn how your comment data is processed.](https://akismet.com/privacy/) #### Previous post [Is legalese a good or bad way to communicate?](https://www.cherryleaf.com/2012/11/is-legalese-a-good-or-bad-way-to-communicate/) #### Next post [If you need a Technical Author who has experience in using Confluence](https://www.cherryleaf.com/2012/12/if-you-need-a-technical-author-who-has-experience-in-using-confluence/) #### Browse posts by month Browse posts by month Select Month October 2026 (3) September 2026 (12) August 2026 (8) July 2026 (7) June 2026 (14) May 2026 (8) April 2026 (6) March 2026 (14) February 2026 (9) January 2026 (9) December 2025 (7) November 2025 (9) October 2025 (10) September 2025 (7) August 2025 (6) July 2025 (1) June 2025 (3) May 2025 (2) April 2025 (5) March 2025 (3) February 2025 (3) January 2025 (2) November 2024 (8) October 2024 (3) September 2024 (2) August 2024 (3) July 2024 (4) June 2024 (1) May 2024 (2) April 2024 (4) March 2024 (1) February 2024 (2) January 2024 (1) December 2023 (2) November 2023 (9) October 2023 (8) September 2023 (5) August 2023 (3) July 2023 (1) June 2023 (1) May 2023 (2) April 2023 (3) March 2023 (2) January 2023 (2) December 2022 (4) November 2022 (1) October 2022 (1) September 2022 (1) August 2022 (1) July 2022 (1) June 2022 (1) May 2022 (2) April 2022 (1) March 2022 (1) February 2022 (1) January 2022 (2) December 2021 (1) November 2021 (2) October 2021 (1) August 2021 (1) July 2021 (2) June 2021 (3) May 2021 (5) April 2021 (3) March 2021 (3) February 2021 (1) January 2021 (2) December 2020 (4) November 2020 (4) August 2020 (3) February 2020 (3) January 2020 (1) November 2019 (3) October 2019 (1) September 2019 (1) August 2019 (3) July 2019 (2) June 2019 (3) May 2019 (4) April 2019 (1) November 2018 (2) October 2018 (1) July 2018 (2) June 2018 (4) May 2018 (2) April 2018 (3) March 2018 (4) February 2018 (2) January 2018 (3) December 2017 (2) October 2017 (3) September 2017 (1) August 2017 (3) July 2017 (2) June 2017 (7) May 2017 (4) April 2017 (5) March 2017 (1) February 2017 (7) January 2017 (1) December 2016 (3) November 2016 (4) October 2016 (1) September 2016 (5) July 2016 (1) June 2016 (3) May 2016 (1) April 2016 (2) February 2016 (2) January 2016 (5) December 2015 (1) November 2015 (4) October 2015 (2) August 2015 (1) July 2015 (1) June 2015 (2) May 2015 (3) February 2015 (2) January 2015 (6) December 2014 (1) October 2014 (1) September 2014 (4) June 2014 (4) May 2014 (1) April 2014 (2) March 2014 (3) February 2014 (4) January 2014 (4) November 2013 (2) October 2013 (5) September 2013 (3) July 2013 (3) June 2013 (11) May 2013 (4) April 2013 (6) March 2013 (7) February 2013 (4) January 2013 (4) December 2012 (9) November 2012 (23) October 2012 (14) September 2012 (8) August 2012 (4) July 2012 (12) June 2012 (12) May 2012 (10) April 2012 (8) March 2012 (12) February 2012 (3) January 2012 (6) December 2011 (2) October 2011 (3) August 2011 (1) June 2011 (5) May 2011 (2) April 2011 (1) January 2011 (1) December 2010 (1) November 2010 (3) October 2010 (4) September 2010 (8) August 2010 (5) May 2010 (2) April 2010 (3) March 2010 (3) February 2010 (2) January 2010 (3) December 2009 (2) November 2009 (6) September 2009 (1) July 2009 (6) June 2009 (7) April 2009 (8) March 2009 (3) February 2009 (3) January 2009 (3) December 2008 (1) November 2008 (3) October 2008 (3) September 2008 (4) August 2008 (1) July 2008 (3) June 2008 (5) May 2008 (2) April 2008 (2) March 2008 (3) February 2008 (2) January 2008 (1) November 2007 (3) October 2007 (2) September 2007 (1) July 2007 (3) November 2006 (1) October 2006 (2) September 2006 (3) August 2006 (1) April 2006 (1) March 2006 (3) #### Browse posts by category